[111835] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Why not law'wI'pu' ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Fri Feb 22 04:25:04 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <62592627-0eed-4853-cc4f-982c54e1333e@gmx.de>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:24:50 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============5880168066959543742==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f21c90582782a84"
--0000000000004f21c90582782a84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 09:40, Lieven L. Litaer <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
> So, IMHO, {law'wI'} "thing/person which is many" makes no sense at all.
>
> Unless, maybe, in situations where the Borg queen said "I am the one who
> is many", but that's a very unusual situation, even in English.
> [...]
> Still, this is an interesting question that cannot be answered entirely,
> as Maltz may tell us other things about that. What about {mapuS} or
> {malaw'}? Isn't that "we are many"?
>
As I alluded to earlier:
law'wI' 'oH pongwIj'e', malaw'mo'. (Mark 5:9)
--
De'vID
--0000000000004f21c90582782a84
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 09:40, Lieven =
L. Litaer <<a href=3D"mailto:levinius@gmx.de">levinius@gmx.de</a>> wr=
ote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px=
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">So, IMHO, {=
law'wI'} "thing/person which is many" makes no sense at a=
ll.<br>
<br>
Unless, maybe, in situations where the Borg queen said "I am the one w=
ho <br>
is many", but that's a very unusual situation, even in English.<br=
>
[...]<br>Still, this is an interesting question that cannot be answered ent=
irely, <br>
as Maltz may tell us other things about that. What about {mapuS} or <br>
{malaw'}? Isn't that "we are many"?<br></blockquote><div>=
<br></div><div>As I alluded to earlier:</div><div>law'wI' 'oH p=
ongwIj'e', malaw'mo'. (Mark 5:9)=C2=A0</div></div><div><br>=
</div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature">De'vID</div></d=
iv>
--0000000000004f21c90582782a84--
--===============5880168066959543742==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============5880168066959543742==--
