[111589] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Placement of the adverb

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nIqolay Q)
Fri Oct 13 12:51:13 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <60acb1f5-b136-6b94-bedb-a3603cd6043d@gmx.de>
From: nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:33:19 -0400
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============3332553321531760614==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c054e5220a174055b464eaa"

--94eb2c054e5220a174055b464eaa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:

> I know that. So my question would be, which is the ovs-construction?
>
> targh Sop loD = OVS
> 'e' legh be'Hom. = OVS
>
> so these combined:
>
> nom targh Sop loD = adverb+OVS
> QIt 'e' legh be'Hom. = adverb+OVS
>
> nom targh Sop loD QIt 'e' legh be'Hom.
>
> Right?
>

Makes sense to me, at least grammatically. (I'm not sure *legh* makes sense
to use with *QIt*, since seeing isn't a process. *lengchoH* would work
though. But that doesn't have anything to do with where the adverbs go.)

--94eb2c054e5220a174055b464eaa
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On W=
ed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Lieven <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto=
:levinius@gmx.de" target=3D"_blank">levinius@gmx.de</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<s=
pan class=3D""></span><br><span class=3D""></span><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
l_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left=
:1ex">
I know that. So my question would be, which is the ovs-construction?<br>
<br>
targh Sop loD =3D OVS<br>
&#39;e&#39; legh be&#39;Hom. =3D OVS<br>
<br>
so these combined:<br>
<br>
nom targh Sop loD =3D adverb+OVS<br>
QIt &#39;e&#39; legh be&#39;Hom. =3D adverb+OVS<br>
<br>
nom targh Sop loD QIt &#39;e&#39; legh be&#39;Hom.<br>
<br>
Right?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Makes sense to me, at least gram=
matically. (I&#39;m not sure <b>legh</b> makes sense to use with <b>QIt</b>=
, since seeing isn&#39;t a process. <b>lengchoH</b> would work though. But =
that doesn&#39;t have anything to do with where the adverbs go.)<br></div><=
/div></div></div>

--94eb2c054e5220a174055b464eaa--

--===============3332553321531760614==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============3332553321531760614==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post