[111503] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Saying I'm not there
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nIqolay Q)
Sat Oct 7 21:06:10 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cKv1PRXccXDpMWz-09oSzXdXxubNHfbeJCfuJFKXRjiQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 17:26:15 -0400
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============6350840971911484516==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c15dfa82ebed055afb9b10"
--001a11c15dfa82ebed055afb9b10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 1:16 PM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting thoughts nIqolay q.
>
> There is one more thing; I know -because it has been discussed in the list
> in the past-, that there is a case, where we don't use the {-taH}.
>
> But I don't remember for sure, what this case is. I think it is, when we
> are asking "when will you be here ?", so we say {ghorgh naDev SoH ?}
>
> But because I'm not certain, can someone verify this ?
>
I do vaguely remember a few canon examples of "location" pronoun verbs that
were used without *-taH*, which is why I said such verbs usually take that
suffix. I don't think those examples necessarily mean you *have* to not use
the *-taH* in that situation, only that there are situations where you can
get away without it. I don't think sticking to the "locative pronoun verbs
take *-taH*" pattern will cause any major mistakes.
--001a11c15dfa82ebed055afb9b10
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
at, Oct 7, 2017 at 1:16 PM, mayqel qunenoS <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D=
"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>></spa=
n> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b=
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto">Interesting t=
houghts nIqolay q.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div>There is one more thing;=
I know -because it has been discussed in the list in the past-, that there=
is a case, where we don't use the {-taH}. <br></div></div></blockquote=
><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1=
px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"auto"><br></d=
iv><div dir=3D"auto">But I don't remember for sure, what this case is. =
I think it is, when we are asking "when will you be here ?", so w=
e say {ghorgh naDev SoH ?}</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"ltr=
">But because I'm not certain, can someone verify this ?</div></div></b=
lockquote><div><br></div><div>I do vaguely remember a few canon examples of=
"location" pronoun verbs that were used without <b>-taH</b>, whi=
ch is why I said such verbs usually take that suffix. I don't think tho=
se examples necessarily mean you <i>have</i> to not use the <b>-taH</b> in =
that situation, only that there are situations where you can get away witho=
ut it. I don't think sticking to the "locative pronoun verbs take =
<b>-taH</b>" pattern will cause any major mistakes.<br></div></div></d=
iv></div>
--001a11c15dfa82ebed055afb9b10--
--===============6350840971911484516==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============6350840971911484516==--
