|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 20:12:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874f6123-49a7-861a-f120-6b6ccf62968e@trimboli.name> Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org Am 04.10.2017 um 20:05 schrieb SuStel: > This isn't a course in logic. It also isn't a course of interpretation. > "When the indirect object is first or second person, oh and third person > too, but I feel like not saying that one for some reason, ..." That's > nonsense. That is YOUR interpretation of the text. Neither of us can assume that one of each versions is true. That's why I will not continue this discussion, because I have learned that we cannot convince each other, and I accept the fact which you taught me, which is when Okrand did not talk about something we just can never know what his opinion on it is. -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.klingonisch.net http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/PrefixTrick _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |