[111320] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Hech
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nIqolay Q)
Sat Sep 30 05:51:10 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cL23VeZUQkNpefZ9MbhwSDDsAYqZL04WsiAg-82xU-yTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:25:21 -0400
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============8574066552072004313==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c15dfa41999a055a574f36"
--001a11c15dfa41999a055a574f36
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:12 PM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> The verb {Hech} is given as "intend, mean to".
>
> However I wonder.. does it always have to have the meaning "mean to" ?
>
> For example, can we say:
>
> {{juH} vIHechbe'; {jul} vIHech}
> I didn't mean {juH}, I meant {jul}
>
Makes sense to me. At worst, I'd probably interpret it as a short or
clipped version of something like *<juH> vIghItlh 'e' vIHechbe'. <jul>
vIghItlh 'e' vIHech.* *"I didn't mean to write 'juH', I meant to write
'jul'." *(Or replace *vIghItlh* with *jIjatlh* for spoken Klingon.) My
guess is that most uses of *Hech* will have an *'e'*, but I don't see why
it couldn't work with a noun object now and then.
--001a11c15dfa41999a055a574f36
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"=
>On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:12 PM, mayqel qunenoS <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a h=
ref=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>>=
;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto">The ver=
b {Hech} is given as "intend, mean to".<div dir=3D"auto"><br></di=
v><div dir=3D"auto">However I wonder.. does it always have to have the mean=
ing "mean to" ?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto=
">For example, can we say:</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"aut=
o">{{juH} vIHechbe'; {jul} vIHech}</div><div dir=3D"auto">I didn't =
mean {juH}, I meant {jul}<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>M=
akes sense to me. At worst, I'd probably interpret it as a short or cli=
pped version of something like <b><juH> vIghItlh 'e' vIHechbe=
'. <jul> vIghItlh 'e' vIHech.</b> <i>"I didn't m=
ean to write 'juH', I meant to write 'jul'." </i>(Or r=
eplace <b>vIghItlh</b> with <b>jIjatlh</b> for spoken Klingon.) My guess is=
that most uses of <b>Hech</b> will have an <b>'e'</b>, but I don&#=
39;t see why it couldn't work with a noun object now and then.</div><di=
v><br></div></div></div></div></div>
--001a11c15dfa41999a055a574f36--
--===============8574066552072004313==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============8574066552072004313==--
