[111296] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Hech

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Sat Sep 30 05:11:00 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:40:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <a3134981-c4c9-205a-be1c-f8695916d8bc@trimboli.name>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0128423483891460432==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------F2B5B55032D87CB04B979324"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------F2B5B55032D87CB04B979324
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 9/29/2017 1:23 PM, SuStel wrote:
> On 9/29/2017 1:12 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>> The verb {Hech} is given as "intend, mean to".
>>
>> However I wonder.. does it always have to have the meaning "mean to" ?
>>
>> For example, can we say:
>>
>> {{juH} vIHechbe'; {jul} vIHech}
>> I didn't mean {juH}, I meant {jul}
>
> Everyone uses it that way, but I'm not so sure. I think the object of 
> *Hech* is a thing you intended to happen or to do, not a thing you 
> intended to say or write. Saying and writing are things you do, but 
> they require their own sentences; the actual content is not something 
> you do.
>
> We know that *'e' Hech* is perfectly legal. *Hem tlhIngan Segh 'ej 
> maHemtaH 'e' wIHech*/Klingons are a proud race, and we intend to go on 
> being proud./ (TKW) There is one other *'e' Hech* example in TKW, and 
> no other examples of *Hech* elsewhere at all.
>
> I would expect saying or doing to be /*juH*/*vIghItlh 'e' vIHechbe'; 
> /juH/ vIghItlh 'e' vIHech.* I'm on the fence whether saying would 
> require a sentence-as-object-as-object: /*juH*/*jIjatlh 'e' vIHechbe'; 
> /jul/ jIjatlh 'e' vIHech* or whether a single word doesn't need to be 
> treated as a quotation because it's not exactly a sentence anyway.
>
I do think there are ways to use *Hech* that don't involve *'e'.* Here's 
an example:

    nablIj wIlajchugh qaS Qugh. nab vIHechbogh jIH wIlajchugh maQapchu'.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name


--------------F2B5B55032D87CB04B979324
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/29/2017 1:23 PM, SuStel wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:a3134981-c4c9-205a-be1c-f8695916d8bc@trimboli.name">
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/29/2017 1:12 PM, mayqel qunenoS
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP7F2cL23VeZUQkNpefZ9MbhwSDDsAYqZL04WsiAg-82xU-yTw@mail.gmail.com">The
        verb {Hech} is given as "intend, mean to".
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">However I wonder.. does it always have to have
          the meaning "mean to" ?</div>
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">For example, can we say:</div>
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">{{juH} vIHechbe'; {jul} vIHech}</div>
        <div dir="auto">I didn't mean {juH}, I meant {jul}</div>
      </blockquote>
      <p>Everyone uses it that way, but I'm not so sure. I think the
        object of <b>Hech</b> is a thing you intended to happen or to
        do, not a thing you intended to say or write. Saying and writing
        are things you do, but they require their own sentences; the
        actual content is not something you do.</p>
      <p>We know that <b>'e' Hech</b> is perfectly legal. <b>Hem
          tlhIngan Segh 'ej maHemtaH 'e' wIHech</b><i> Klingons are a
          proud race, and we intend to go on being proud.</i> (TKW)
        There is one other <b>'e' Hech</b> example in TKW, and no other
        examples of <b>Hech</b> elsewhere at all.<br>
      </p>
      <p>I would expect saying or doing to be <i><b>juH</b></i><b>
          vIghItlh 'e' vIHechbe'; <i>juH</i> vIghItlh 'e' vIHech.</b>
        I'm on the fence whether saying would require a
        sentence-as-object-as-object: <i><b>juH</b></i><b> jIjatlh 'e'
          vIHechbe'; <i>jul</i> jIjatlh 'e' vIHech</b> or whether a
        single word doesn't need to be treated as a quotation because
        it's not exactly a sentence anyway.</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>I do think there are ways to use <b>Hech</b> that don't involve
      <b>'e'.</b> Here's an example:</p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>nablIj wIlajchugh qaS Qugh. nab vIHechbogh jIH wIlajchugh
        maQapchu'.<br>
      </p>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------F2B5B55032D87CB04B979324--

--===============0128423483891460432==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============0128423483891460432==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post