[111263] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] What Maltz does: {'otHa'}

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIE3DvGxsZXI=?=)
Fri Sep 29 04:37:59 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <20170928172135.GA20517@eriophora>
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpIE3DvGxsZXI=?= <esperantist@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:26:57 +0200
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============0243945835549620751==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f8b081ec83f055a433743"

--f403045f8b081ec83f055a433743
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think ambitransitive isn't the right word here. Ambitransitive verbs can
be intransitive or transitive, like {Soj vISop} vs. {jISop}. This one
reminds me more of Chinese and Thai in which some verbs are their own
causative verb. But I cannot remember the correct term for this type of
verb...

- Andr=C3=A9

2017-09-28 19:21 GMT+02:00 kechpaja <kechpaja@comcast.net>:

> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 05:06:45PM +0000, Steven Boozer wrote:
> > SEE ALSO:
> > pegh          keep something secret, be secret, classified (v)
>
> Wait, does this mean that {pegh} is ambitransitive? Klingon seems to
> have very few verbs of that type, so I figure it would be worth
> explicitly checking.
>
>  - SapIr
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>

--f403045f8b081ec83f055a433743
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I think ambitransitive isn&#39;t the right word here.=
 Ambitransitive verbs can be intransitive or transitive, like {Soj vISop} v=
s. {jISop}. This one reminds me more of Chinese and Thai in which some verb=
s are their own causative verb. But I cannot remember the correct term for =
this type of verb...<br><br></div>- Andr=C3=A9<br></div><div class=3D"gmail=
_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2017-09-28 19:21 GMT+02:00 kechpaja =
<span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:kechpaja@comcast.net" target=3D"_bl=
ank">kechpaja@comcast.net</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo=
te" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"=
><span class=3D"">On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 05:06:45PM +0000, Steven Boozer w=
rote:<br>
&gt; SEE ALSO:<br>
&gt; pegh=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 keep something secret, be secre=
t, classified (v)<br>
<br>
</span>Wait, does this mean that {pegh} is ambitransitive? Klingon seems to=
<br>
have very few verbs of that type, so I figure it would be worth<br>
explicitly checking.<br>
<br>
=C2=A0- SapIr<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">______________________________<wbr>=
_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a=
><br>
<a href=3D"http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel=3D"n=
oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhinga=
n-hol-kli.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--f403045f8b081ec83f055a433743--

--===============0243945835549620751==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============0243945835549620751==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post