[111204] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Sao without the {'e'}
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Wed Sep 27 05:23:06 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cJf+4PcSeXt=wR37rj-v=60Z_t1EHT7PS5zvGUzmkZ1mg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 11:23:02 +0200
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============2299204326903878056==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140f010b4dbec055a285606"
--001a1140f010b4dbec055a285606
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On 27 September 2017 at 10:26, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> At another thread we accepted the following as being correct:
>
> {tlhIngan maH. taHjaj}
> we are klingons. may it continue.
>
> And the way I understand the above sentence, it goes "may it continue.
> what ? the fact that we are klingons".
>
> Lets assume now that I write the following:
>
> {latlh be' vImuSHa'. 'e' DaSov}
> I love another woman. You know that.
>
> Based on the {tlhIngan maH. taHjaj}, why couldn't I write too:
>
> {latlh be' vImuSHa. DaSov}
> I love another woman. You know it.
>
> And be equally correct ? Do I necessarily need to place the {'e'} before
> the {DaSov} ?
>
Let me ask you this:
"You know that I love another woman."
"I love another woman. You know it."
Are these English sentences equally correct? It's the same difference.
--
De'vID
--001a1140f010b4dbec055a285606
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On 27 September 2017 at 10:26, mayqel qunenoS <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a =
href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>&g=
t;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0=
px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div =
dir=3D"auto">At another thread we accepted the following as being correct:<=
div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">{tlhIngan maH. taHjaj}</div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto">we are klingons. may it continue.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><b=
r></div><div dir=3D"auto">And the way I understand the above sentence, it g=
oes "may it continue. what ? the fact that we are klingons".</div=
><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Lets assume now that I write=
the following:</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">{latlh b=
e' vImuSHa'. 'e' DaSov}</div><div dir=3D"auto">I love anoth=
er woman. You know that.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"=
>Based on the {tlhIngan maH. taHjaj}, why couldn't I write too:</div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">{latlh be' vImuSHa. DaSov}<=
/div><div dir=3D"auto">I love another woman. You know it.</div><div dir=3D"=
auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">And be equally correct ? Do I necessarily=
need to place the {'e'} before the {DaSov} ?</div></div></blockquo=
te></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div>Let me ask you this:</div><di=
v class=3D"gmail_extra">"You know that I love another woman."</di=
v><div class=3D"gmail_extra">"I love another woman. You know it."=
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">Are t=
hese English sentences equally correct? It's the same difference.<br cl=
ear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature">De'vID=
</div>
</div></div>
--001a1140f010b4dbec055a285606--
--===============2299204326903878056==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============2299204326903878056==--
