[111155] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] One dog or five cats ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Sat Sep 23 13:47:12 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:46:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5899274.196.1506143168031.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============2376984714512803423==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------A85F81345CB4F650AF43948A"
Content-Language: en-US
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------A85F81345CB4F650AF43948A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 9/23/2017 1:06 AM, Anthony Appleyard wrote:
> Is this "one only" rule specifically stated? Or merely have no canon
> examples appeared with more than one verb acting adjectivally on a
> noun at a time?
>
> ----Original message----
> From : sustel@trimboli.name
> Date : 22/09/2017 - 14:45 (GMTST)
> To : tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
> Subject : Re: [tlhIngan Hol] One dog or five cats ?
>
> On 9/22/2017 9:34 AM, Anthony Appleyard wrote:
>> Sorry; is there a rule against directly:?
>> wa' Human nen yoH
>> one brave adult human
>
> So far as we know, we can only use one verb acting adjectivally on
> a noun at a time.
>
If it were specifically stated, I wouldn't have said "so far as we know."
Okrand has not used such a construction, and he has gone out of his way
to avoid it. Nothing tells us that we CAN do it. So odds are it's not
allowed.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
--------------A85F81345CB4F650AF43948A
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/23/2017 1:06 AM, Anthony Appleyard
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:5899274.196.1506143168031.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost">Is
this "one only" rule specifically stated? Or merely have no canon
examples appeared with more than one verb acting adjectivally on a
noun at a time?
<blockquote style="margin-right: 0px; margin-left:15px;">----Original
message----<br>
From : <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sustel@trimboli.name">sustel@trimboli.name</a><br>
Date : 22/09/2017 - 14:45 (GMTST)<br>
To : <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org">tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org</a><br>
Subject : Re: [tlhIngan Hol] One dog or five cats ?<br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/22/2017 9:34 AM, Anthony
Appleyard wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:730807.31447.1506087267539.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost">Sorry;
is there a rule against directly:?<br>
<span style="font-family: sans-serif;font-size: 14.6547px;">wa'
Human nen yoH</span><br>
one brave adult human<br>
</blockquote>
<p>So far as we know, we can only use one verb acting
adjectivally on a noun at a time.</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>If it were specifically stated, I wouldn't have said "so far as
we know."</p>
<p>Okrand has not used such a construction, and he has gone out of
his way to avoid it. Nothing tells us that we CAN do it. So odds
are it's not allowed.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------A85F81345CB4F650AF43948A--
--===============2376984714512803423==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============2376984714512803423==--
