[110963] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nIqolay Q)
Tue Sep 12 15:46:24 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CALPi+eRWcYY00Mr8CUfHBmSUqRx6WZM=U+GyzwL-DLXO3joM4A@mail.gmail.com>
From: nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:27:11 -0400
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============1037281536005566840==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ff19216fce705590231f0"
--001a113ff19216fce705590231f0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:53 PM, qurgh lungqIj <qurgh@wizage.net> wrote:
> Part of me wants to believe it's a joke phrase. Anyone trying to figure it
> out will quickly end up saying, "I'm lost! I don't get this grammar at
> all!" :D
>
It might be a holdover from an earlier experiment in grammar, maybe
involving the ordering of nouns in relative clauses or something, and then
he forgot to change it back when he changed his mind. It's probably just a
mistake, though.
Maybe if someone asked about it, he'd retcon it into being some kind of
fossilized idiomatic expression or something. I do enjoy those.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:00 PM, demonchaux.aurelie <
demonchaux.aurelie@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is a good question - I am also wondering about this sentence, because
> somehow it feels wrong to include {naDev} at all.
>
I like it, personally. It demonstrates how {naDev} and the other locatives
are just nouns like any other noun.
--001a113ff19216fce705590231f0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:53 PM, qurgh lungqIj <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:qurgh@wizage.net" target=3D"_blank">qurgh@wi=
zage.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"=
gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px =
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"=
ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>Part of me =
wants to believe it's a joke phrase. Anyone trying to figure it out wil=
l quickly end up saying, "I'm lost! I don't get this grammar a=
t all!" :D<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div=
>It might be a holdover from an earlier experiment in grammar, maybe=20
involving the ordering of nouns in relative clauses or something, and then =
he forgot=20
to change it back when he changed his mind. It's probably just a mistak=
e, though. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Maybe if someone asked about it, h=
e'd retcon=20
it into being some kind of fossilized idiomatic expression or something.
I do enjoy those.</div><div><br></div><div>On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:00 PM=
, demonchaux.aurelie <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:demonchaux.aur=
elie@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">demonchaux.aurelie@gmail.com</a>></spa=
n> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px =
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>It is a=
good question - I am also wondering about this sentence, because somehow i=
t feels wrong to include {naDev} at all.</div></blockquote><div>=C2=A0</div=
></div></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">I like it, personally. It dem=
onstrates how {naDev} and the other locatives are just nouns like any other=
noun.<br></div></div>
--001a113ff19216fce705590231f0--
--===============1037281536005566840==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============1037281536005566840==--
