[110925] in tlhIngan-Hol
[tlhIngan Hol] qaStaHvIS ram timestamp
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Sun Sep 10 08:51:20 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cLoAJkcXp4tXQmFwfBRSwUn8ds+zio89-95ZvDCVcoaMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:44:10 +0300
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============7864691381297847502==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1b3b54b0f4ce0558d52a0e"
--94eb2c1b3b54b0f4ce0558d52a0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
The {ram} "night", used in the following way is a timestamp:
{ram, leghchuq maH vIghro' je}
at night, we and the cat will see each other
Is the {qaStaHvIS ram} a timestamp too ? And the reason I am asking, is
with regards to its placement in a sentence, which also happens to have a
noun with a type-5 suffix. For example:
{juHDaq, qaStaHvIS ram, maHaD maH vIghro' je}
at home, during the night, we and the cat will be studying
{qaStaHvIS ram, juHDaq, maHaD maH vIghro' je}
during the night, at home, we and the cat will be studying
The way I understand it, there is no rule as to what needs to come first; a
timestamp, or a noun with a type-5 suffix.
So, if the {qaStaHvIS ram} is a timestamp, then both of the above sentences
must be correct.
But the question is, whether the {qaStaHvIS ram} is indeed a timestamp,
because if it isn't, then it necessarily needs to follow the {juHDaq}.
qunnoq
--94eb2c1b3b54b0f4ce0558d52a0e
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">The {ram} "night", used in the following way is=
a timestamp:<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">{ram, leghchuq m=
aH vIghro' je}</div><div dir=3D"auto">at night, we and the cat will see=
each other</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Is the {qaSt=
aHvIS ram} a timestamp too ? And the reason I am asking, is with regards to=
its placement in a sentence, which also happens to have a noun with a type=
-5 suffix. For example:</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">=
{juHDaq, qaStaHvIS ram, maHaD maH vIghro' je}</div><div dir=3D"auto">at=
home, during the night, we and the cat will be studying</div><div dir=3D"a=
uto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">{qaStaHvIS ram, juHDaq, maHaD maH vIghro&#=
39; je}</div><div dir=3D"auto">during the night, at home, we and the cat wi=
ll be studying</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">The way I=
understand it, there is no rule as to what needs to come first; a timestam=
p, or a noun with a type-5 suffix.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div di=
r=3D"auto">So, if the {qaStaHvIS ram} is a timestamp, then both of the abov=
e sentences must be correct.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"a=
uto">But the question is, whether the {qaStaHvIS ram} is indeed a timestamp=
, because if it isn't, then it necessarily needs to follow the {juHDaq}=
.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">qunnoq</div><div dir=
=3D"auto"><br></div></div>
--94eb2c1b3b54b0f4ce0558d52a0e--
--===============7864691381297847502==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============7864691381297847502==--
