[110721] in tlhIngan-Hol
[tlhIngan Hol] {ruS} and {ngIng}
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Sun Aug 20 10:50:45 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 16:50:41 +0200
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
The verbs {ruS} and {ngIng} were revealed at last year's (2016) qep'a'.
I have written down for the defintions:
{ruS} v. have a positive charge
{ngIng} v. have a negative charge
The KLI New Words List have these defined as:
{ruS} v. have a positive charge, be positivily (sic) charged
{ngIng} v. have a negative charge, be negatively charged
Are these stative verbs? I copied the definitions from an image of the
original qep'a' booklet which was posted online, and the "be"
definitions weren't ther. Were they added/clarified later?
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
