[110635] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] We got words for a Spiral,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Wed Aug 16 04:50:20 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAG84SOsw-XHgDD1Ft-Q-FOzXa0WX_mhz+K26T5W846tP4HbVYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:50:15 +0300
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
mupwI':
> Antares vertaHbogh vIHtaHghach'a'
SuStel:
> I'm not fond of this; it looks like a very forced -ghach. How about just saying Antares mI'rab'a'
What do you mean by saying "a very forced -ghach" ?
qunnoq
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:01 PM, nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:46 PM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/9/2017 1:39 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>>
>> maj !
>>
>> And finally, would you accept {pov Dung}, for the "area above is
>> excellent" ?
>>
>> Yes, with the caveat that if Hay typically requires a companion noun,
>> maaaaaaaaybe the other "area" nouns do too, but I wouldn't hold anyone to
>> it, including myself.
>
> It might just be a semantic issue. Other locational nouns seem to either
> imply a direction or are used with an implied {naDev}, so something like
> {DungDaq} on its own could perhaps be used for "upwards, towards a general
> above-area" or "above here". But the notion of "beyond" doesn't really imply
> a direction, and it's defined relative to "here" so you'd need to reference
> a second point. With the right context you could probably get away with a
> lone {Hay}. {HayDaq ngem wIchIq} makes sense to me, for instance.
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
