[110620] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Proper use of adverbial {je}
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Tue Aug 15 10:47:18 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmOcNiQm_iEW8=+E1V85=2dJ6qR62OzFxgSx-n_fEpi6AA@mail.gmail.com>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:47:15 +0300
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============8996890711246491111==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c13069401e4a20556cbdb02"
--94eb2c13069401e4a20556cbdb02
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
De'vID:
> nuqjatlh? Where does it say the same verb has to be
> repeated twice?
Perhaps I made the wrong choice of words. I meant that according to tkd,
the adverbial {je} comes after a verb and that's it. We have a single verb,
which remains the same (regardless of how many times it has been repeated
in a dialogue/passage), with the subject and/or object possibly changing.
guy 1: qalegh
guy 2: qalegh too
(two guys having seen each other, or guy 2 saying to guy 1 that he saw him
and someone else or others too).
The question which led to this thread, was whether we could have a use of
the adverbial {je}, in this way:
{Su'IH. 'ej Suwoch je}
You are beautiful. And you are also tall.
This is what I meant by writting "two different verbs".
qunnoq
On 15 Aug 2017 5:33 pm, "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:
On 15 August 2017 at 16:26, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I understand the adverbial use of {je}, as it is described in tkd, and
as
> nIqolay Q explained, we need to have the same verb, repeated twice.
nuqjatlh? Where does it say the same verb has to be repeated twice?
The example in TKD is {qaleghpu' je}. There's no repetition of {legh}.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--94eb2c13069401e4a20556cbdb02
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">De'vID:<div dir=3D"auto">>=C2=A0<span style=3D"fon=
t-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">nuqjatlh? Where does it say the sam=
e verb has to be=C2=A0</span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-fa=
mily:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">> repeated twice?</span></div><div c=
lass=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=
=3D"auto">Perhaps I made the wrong choice of words. I meant that according =
to tkd, the adverbial {je} comes after a verb and that's it. We have a =
single verb, which remains the same (regardless of how many times it has be=
en repeated in a dialogue/passage), with the subject and/or object possibly=
changing.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto">guy 1: qalegh</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra=
" dir=3D"auto">guy 2: qalegh too</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"aut=
o"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto">(two guys having seen =
each other, or guy 2 saying to guy 1 that he saw him and someone else or ot=
hers too).</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto">The question which led to this thread, was w=
hether we could have a use of the adverbial {je}, in this way:</div><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=
=3D"auto">{Su'IH. 'ej Suwoch je}</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" di=
r=3D"auto">You are beautiful. And you are also tall.</div><div class=3D"gma=
il_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto">Th=
is is what I meant by writting "two different verbs".</div><div c=
lass=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=
=3D"auto">qunnoq</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br></div><di=
v class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gmail_quote" dir=3D"auto=
">On 15 Aug 2017 5:33 pm, "De'vID" <<a href=3D"mailto:de.v=
id.jonpin@gmail.com">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attr=
ibution"><blockquote class=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left=
:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"quoted-text">On 15 August 2=
017 at 16:26, mayqel qunenoS <<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com">mihko=
un@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> As I understand the adverbial use of {je}, as it is described in tkd, =
and as<br>
> nIqolay Q explained, we need to have the same verb, repeated twice.<br=
>
<br>
</div>nuqjatlh? Where does it say the same verb has to be repeated twice?<b=
r>
<br>
The example in TKD is {qaleghpu' je}. There's no repetition of {leg=
h}.<br>
<div class=3D"elided-text"><br>
--<br>
De'vID<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a=
><br>
<a href=3D"http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel=3D"n=
oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhinga=
n-hol-kli.org</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
--94eb2c13069401e4a20556cbdb02--
--===============8996890711246491111==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============8996890711246491111==--
