[110584] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Reversing the order of {-vo'}
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Fri Aug 11 18:42:55 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <60f74971-ca6d-492b-abbd-a34211c255c2@trimboli.name>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 00:42:45 +0200
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Cc: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
On 11 August 2017 at 01:54, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
> I left it out for exactly the reason I stated: you don't need it to see what
> the role of X-Daq Y-vo' V seems to be when X is of a greater scope than Y. I
> wasn't continuing to describe your scenario.
This was the point I was trying to make with my sentences, which in
retrospect were more complicated than necessary to illustrate the
point.
{vaS'a'vo' tera'Daq chegh} "he/she returns from the Great Hall to Earth"
{tera'Daq vaS'a'vo' chegh} does this mean "on Earth, he/she returns
from the Great Hall" or "he/she returns to Earth from the Great Hall"?
The latter feels like it's saying that {vaS'a'} is located on Earth.
WIth {X-vo' Y-Daq chegh}, this ambiguity does not exist.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
