[110560] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] When did you buy the phone which you now use ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Fri Aug 11 10:28:17 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cLzxg1WMO5D2rv-HshSR5O9=rNryhMDtq2HXs1f+v2mQA@mail.gmail.com>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:28:13 +0300
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============6601415642686015849==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146173c95c2fe05567b1f17"
--001a1146173c95c2fe05567b1f17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
ok, thanks !
But there is something else, which I need to ask.
SuStel:
> *DaH ghogh HablI''e' Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje'? *
Isn't the object of {Dalo'bogh} the {ghogh HablI''e'} ?
And if it isn't the object (case in which it isn't necessary for it to be
placed right before the {Dalo'bogh}),
instead of {*DaH ghogh HablI''e' Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje'?} *could we write
{ghogh HablI''e' DaH Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje' ?} ?
qunnoq
On 11 Aug 2017 5:09 pm, "nIqolay Q" <niqolay0@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> All of these are indeed wonderful suggestions, but let me ask you
> something.
>
> Is the original sentence {ghorgh DaH ghogh HablI' Dalo'bogh Daje' ?} grammatically
> correct ?
>
> Can we have side by side {ghorgh} and {DaH} ? This has been the source of
> my confusion in the first place.
>
Why not? You're allowed to use adverbials in relative clauses, and {ghorgh}
goes at the beginning of the main sentence. It may or may not be awkward
but I see no reason it would be ungrammatical.
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--001a1146173c95c2fe05567b1f17
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">ok, thanks !<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"=
>But there is something else, which I need to ask.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><=
br></div><div dir=3D"auto">SuStel:</div><div dir=3D"auto">>=C2=A0<b styl=
e=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">DaH ghogh HablI''e&=
#39; Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje'? =C2=A0=C2=A0</b></div><div dir=3D"aut=
o"><b style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px"><br></b></div><di=
v dir=3D"auto">Isn't the object of {Dalo'bogh} the {ghogh HablI'=
;'e'} ?<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">And =
if it isn't the object (case in which it isn't necessary for it to =
be placed right before the {Dalo'bogh}),</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></d=
iv><div dir=3D"auto">instead of {<b style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-si=
ze:13.696px">DaH ghogh HablI''e' Dalo'bogh: ghorgh Daje'=
;?}=C2=A0</b>could we write {ghogh HablI''e' DaH Dalo'bogh:=
ghorgh Daje' ?} ?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">q=
unnoq</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On 11 Aug 2017 5:09 pm, "nIqolay Q" <<a href=3D"mailto:niqolay=
0@gmail.com">niqolay0@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc sol=
id;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"quoted-text">On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM=
, mayqel qunenoS <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com"=
target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;=
padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto">All of these are indeed wonderful sugge=
stions, but let me ask you something.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=
=3D"auto">Is the original sentence=C2=A0<span style=3D"font-family:sans-ser=
if;font-size:13.696px">{ghorgh DaH ghogh HablI' Dalo'bogh Daje'=
?}=C2=A0</span>grammatically correct ?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto">Can we have side by side {ghorgh} and {DaH} ? This has been=
the source of my confusion in the first place.<br></div></div></blockquote=
><div><br></div></div><div>Why not? You're allowed to use adverbials in=
relative clauses, and {ghorgh} goes at the beginning of the main sentence.=
It may or may not be awkward but I see no reason it would be ungrammatical=
. <br></div></div></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a=
><br>
<a href=3D"http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel=3D"n=
oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhinga=
n-hol-kli.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a1146173c95c2fe05567b1f17--
--===============6601415642686015849==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============6601415642686015849==--
