[110545] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] When did you buy the phone which you now use ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nIqolay Q)
Fri Aug 11 09:23:22 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cLjucGWWqfTRf+Dz1STfuvgfHjbagXx6wCmX=nregpS6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: nIqolay Q <niqolay0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:23:18 -0400
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============3971496759754214944==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05a38469334305567a37fd"
--94eb2c05a38469334305567a37fd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:18 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was wondering whether we can pack into a single klingon sentence, the
> question:
>
> "When did you buy the phone, which you now use ?"
>
> If we translated it exactly, then perhaps we would have:
>
> {ghorgh DaH ghogh HablI' Dalo'bogh Daje' ?}
>
> But the existence, side-by-side of {ghorgh} and {DaH}, results in an
> awkward sentence
>
It doesn't seem that awkward to me. Since it doesn't make sense for the
{DaH} to go with {Daje'}, it must be going with the relative clause.
--94eb2c05a38469334305567a37fd
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F=
ri, Aug 11, 2017 at 9:18 AM, mayqel qunenoS <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>></=
span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8e=
x;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto">I was wond=
ering whether we can pack into a single klingon sentence, the question:<div=
dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">"When did you buy the phone,=
which you now use ?"<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D=
"auto">If we translated it exactly, then perhaps we would have:</div><div d=
ir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">{ghorgh DaH ghogh HablI' Dalo&#=
39;bogh Daje' ?}</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">But=
the existence, side-by-side of {ghorgh} and {DaH}, results in an awkward s=
entence</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It doesn't seem tha=
t awkward to me. Since it doesn't make sense for the {DaH} to go with {=
Daje'}, it must be going with the relative clause. <br></div></div><br>=
</div></div>
--94eb2c05a38469334305567a37fd--
--===============3971496759754214944==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============3971496759754214944==--
