[110533] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Is Star Trek: Discovery a new canon category?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Fri Aug 11 03:12:41 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <5d2a415e-f0b0-bb0c-9b2c-eafc6f261c99@gmx.de>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 10:12:36 +0300
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
lieven:
> You write a little agitated, but I agree absolutley with you.
oh sorry ! I didn't realize that, and if I gave the impression that I
am agitated I apologise. I was only trying to express my point.
qunnoq
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 11.08.2017 um 08:56 schrieb mayqel qunenoS:
>>
>> Unless a sentence comes from 'oqranD, then it isn't canon.
>
> [..]
>>
>> So, unless 'oqranD says that he read/wrote/approved each and every
>> klingon sentence and translation of it, I refuse to accept it as
>> canon.
>
>
> You write a little agitated, but I agree absolutley with you.
>
> Since that seems the general opinion here, I've written that into the
> Klingon language wiki, especially for future reference so that also newbies
> know that.
>
> http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/IsDiscoveryCanon
>
> --
> Lieven L. Litaer
> aka Quvar valer 'utlh
> Grammarian of the KLI
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
