[110529] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Is Star Trek: Discovery a new canon category?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Fri Aug 11 01:51:56 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 07:51:59 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAG84SOvHCNSWhLgGzuFQgyKymXYwbZ171AiTVaUdByzcbKtz3w@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
Am 11.08.2017 um 04:28 schrieb nIqolay Q:
> One of the major differences between Discovery and Klingon Hamlet is
> that Discovery is going to be Actual Star Trek Canon.
There's the point: it's "Star Trek" canon, but still not pour Okrandian
canon. Remember all the gibberish we'se seen on Deep Space nine? That
certainly is canon, but wo don't even understand a word from it.
Turning this around, did you know that the Star Trek wiki Memory Alpha
does NOT consider {tlhIngan Hol} as canon? They regard only things seen
on screen, so the books which we highly praise are non existent for them.
Although I would love to see all Discovery phrases as being (our) canon,
I must agree that these must be considered as a secondary work like
Hamlet etc. -- at least until Marc Okrand puts his name under it
confirming that he has checked and approved all of them.
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/IsDiscoveryCanon ?
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
