[109825] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Imperatives and {-be'}
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Fri Jul 7 03:01:52 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 09:01:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <986f3cd2-b3ea-a83d-4256-adc980a64c06@trimboli.name>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
Am 06.07.2017 um 20:54 schrieb Lieven:
> there is no example for or against this,
>> Am 06.07.2017 um 21:07 schrieb SuStel:
>>> There sure is an example against this:
> On 7/6/2017 3:32 PM, Lieven wrote:
>> I was talking about canon phrases as an example.
Am 06.07.2017 um 21:46 schrieb SuStel:
> How do you have an example sentence which proves you can't use *-be'*
> anywhere in an imperative?
Please stop twisting my words.
In my first post, I said there are no examples, then you mentioned TKD.
I corrected that we need canon PHRASES as examples. Of course there
cannot be any examples proving the nonexistence of something.
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
