[109786] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] qep'a' webpage

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Wed Jul 5 16:20:12 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <cf84f347-05ab-37a7-cc5e-577304d4acb6@trimboli.name>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 23:19:57 +0300
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============4860963029588483498==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1cba5a4f1284055397b9de"

--94eb2c1cba5a4f1284055397b9de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

SuStel:

*> jIHDaq ve'**> he travels on me*
> He's riding on my back, or something like that. The
> destination is unstated. You can tell that *jIHDaq* is not the
> object of *ve'*because the verb prefix agrees
> with *he/she/it/they/none.*

I fail to see how the {jIHDaq ve'} produces the "he travels on me".

According to the canon (or so I think) example of {bIQtIqDaq jIjaH} for "I
go in the river/I am moving along the river" (HQ 7.4, Dec 1998), whenever
we have the {-Daq} with a verb of movement, which verb of movement has a
verb prefix indicating no object, then the {-Daq} indicates the location
where the going takes place.

So, as I understand the example of {jIHDaq ve'} the meaning isn't "he
travels (with a purpose) on me"; it is rather "he is traveling with a
purpose in the vicinity of me".

qunnoq






On 5 Jul 2017 8:52 pm, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:

> On 7/5/2017 1:26 PM, David Holt wrote:
>
> ghItlh mayqel qunenoS:
>
> >> DaH qep'a' ve'meH bonablaH.
>
>
> >If the {ve'} as a verb of movement follows the same rules with {jaH}, and
> the sentence refers to a single person, then..
>
> >shouldn't this be {DaH qep'a'Daq Dave'meH bInablaH} or {DaH qep'a'
> Da'vemeH bInablaH} ?
>
>
> Since the {bo-} prefix is used on the main verb, the sentence is not
> referring to a single person.  To be safe, this should be, {DaH qep'a'Daq
> bove'meH bonablaH}.  The {-Daq} is actually optional and should not be a
> point of contention or argument.
>
> It's not that it's optional; it's that it's redundant. Let me use an
> example that makes it clear what is an object and what isn't (assuming
> *ve'* works like *jaH*).
>
>
> *jIH muve' *
> *he travels to me *I am his destination. *jIH* is the object of *ve'.*
>
>
> *jIHDaq ve' *
> *he travels on me *He's riding on my back, or something like that. The
> destination is unstated. You can tell that *jIHDaq* is not the object of
> *ve'* because the verb prefix agrees with *he/she/it/they/none.*
>
>
> *jIHDaq muve' *
> *he travels to at-me; he travels to me-as-location *This is grammatical;
> you're just marking *me* explicitly as a location. The verb prefix agrees
> with *jIHDaq* and shows that that's its object. But since *ve'* includes
> the notion that its object is a location, this is redundant. I have tried
> to reproduce its effect in the English translation above. The Klingon is
> more formally grammatically correct than the English.
>
> Unfortunately, the line from the movie is simply *jIve'.* We don't
> actually know whether it is a "verb of motion" or not. Since it is compared
> to *leng,* which is a verb of motion, my money is on *ve'* being one too.
>
> --
> SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>

--94eb2c1cba5a4f1284055397b9de
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">SuStel:<div dir=3D"auto"><b style=3D"font-family:sans-ser=
if;font-size:13.696px">&gt; jIHDaq ve&#39;<br></b><i style=3D"font-family:s=
ans-serif;font-size:13.696px">&gt; he travels on me</i></div><div dir=3D"au=
to"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">&gt; He&#39;s=
 riding on my back, or something like that. The=C2=A0</span></div><div dir=
=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">&gt; de=
stination is unstated. You can tell that=C2=A0</span><b style=3D"font-famil=
y:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">jIHDaq</b><span style=3D"font-family:sans-=
serif;font-size:13.696px">=C2=A0is not the=C2=A0</span></div><div dir=3D"au=
to"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">&gt; object o=
f=C2=A0</span><b style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">ve&#39=
;</b><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">because the =
verb prefix agrees=C2=A0</span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-=
family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">&gt; with=C2=A0</span><i style=3D"fon=
t-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px">he/she/it/they/none.</i></div><div =
dir=3D"auto"><i style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px"><br></i=
></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">I fail to s=
ee how the {jIHDaq ve&#39;} produces the &quot;he travels on me&quot;.=C2=
=A0</span><i style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px"><br></i></=
div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></span></d=
iv><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">According to th=
e canon (or so I think) example of {bIQtIqDaq jIjaH} for &quot;I go in the =
river/I am moving along the river&quot; (HQ 7.4, Dec 1998), whenever we hav=
e the {-Daq} with a verb of movement, which verb of movement has a verb pre=
fix indicating no object, then the {-Daq} indicates the location where the =
going takes place.</span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family=
:sans-serif"><br></span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:=
sans-serif">So, as I understand the example of {jIHDaq ve&#39;} the meaning=
 isn&#39;t &quot;he travels (with a purpose) on me&quot;; it is rather &quo=
t;he is traveling with a purpose in the vicinity of me&quot;.</span></div><=
div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></span></div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">qunnoq</span></div><=
div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif"><br></span></div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto"><i style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px"><br>=
</i></div><div dir=3D"auto"><i style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size:13=
.696px"><br></i></div><div dir=3D"auto"><i style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;=
font-size:13.696px"><br></i></div><div dir=3D"auto"><i style=3D"font-family=
:sans-serif;font-size:13.696px"><br></i></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_ext=
ra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 5 Jul 2017 8:52 pm, &quot;SuStel&quot=
; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sustel@trimboli.name" target=3D"_blank">sustel@trim=
boli.name</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:=
1ex">
 =20
   =20
 =20
  <div text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF">
    <div class=3D"m_-2718200775927719260moz-cite-prefix">On 7/5/2017 1:26 P=
M, David Holt wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type=3D"cite">
      <p><span style=3D"font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">ghIt=
lh mayqel qunenoS:</span></p>
      <div>
        <div id=3D"m_-2718200775927719260divRplyFwdMsg" dir=3D"ltr" style=
=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)">
        </div>
        <div>
          <div dir=3D"auto">
            <p style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0);margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;f=
ont-family:calibri,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:17.12px">
              <span style=3D"font-size:12pt">&gt;&gt; DaH qep&#39;a&#39; ve=
&#39;meH
                bonablaH.</span></p>
            <p style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0);margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;f=
ont-family:calibri,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:17.12px">
              <span style=3D"font-size:17.12px"><br>
              </span></p>
            <p style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0);margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;f=
ont-family:calibri,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:17.12px">
              <span style=3D"font-size:17.12px">&gt;If the {ve&#39;} as a v=
erb
                of movement follows the same rules with {jaH}, and the
                sentence refers to a single person, then..</span></p>
            <p style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0);margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;f=
ont-family:calibri,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:17.12px">
              <span style=3D"font-size:17.12px">&gt;shouldn&#39;t this be
                {DaH qep&#39;a&#39;Daq Dave&#39;meH bInablaH} or {DaH qep&#=
39;a&#39;
                Da&#39;vemeH bInablaH} ?</span><br>
            </p>
            <p style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0);margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;f=
ont-family:calibri,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:17.12px">
              <span style=3D"font-size:17.12px"><br>
              </span></p>
            <p style=3D"margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px"><font face=3D"cal=
ibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:17.12px">Since=
 the {bo-} prefix is
                  used on the main verb, the sentence is not
                  referring=C2=A0to a single person.=C2=A0 To be safe, this=
 should
                  be, {DaH qep&#39;a&#39;Daq bove&#39;meH bonablaH}.=C2=A0 =
The {-Daq} is
                  actually optional and should not be a point of
                  contention or argument.</span></font></p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>It&#39;s not that it&#39;s optional; it&#39;s that it&#39;s redundan=
t. Let me use
      an example that makes it clear what is an object and what isn&#39;t
      (assuming <b>ve&#39;</b> works like <b>jaH</b>).</p>
    <p><b>jIH muve&#39;<br>
      </b><i>he travels to me<br>
      </i>I am his destination. <b>jIH</b> is the object of <b>ve&#39;.</b>=
<br>
    </p>
    <p><b>jIHDaq ve&#39;<br>
      </b><i>he travels on me<br>
      </i>He&#39;s riding on my back, or something like that. The
      destination is unstated. You can tell that <b>jIHDaq</b> is not
      the object of <b>ve&#39;</b> because the verb prefix agrees with <i>h=
e/she/it/they/none.</i></p>
    <p><b>jIHDaq muve&#39;<br>
      </b><i>he travels to at-me; he travels to me-as-location<br>
      </i>This is grammatical; you&#39;re just marking <i>me</i> explicitly
      as a location. The verb prefix agrees with <b>jIHDaq</b> and
      shows that that&#39;s its object. But since <b>ve&#39;</b> includes t=
he
      notion that its object is a location, this is redundant. I have
      tried to reproduce its effect in the English translation above.
      The Klingon is more formally grammatically correct than the
      English.</p>
    <p>Unfortunately, the line from the movie is simply <b>jIve&#39;.</b>
      We don&#39;t actually know whether it is a &quot;verb of motion&quot;=
 or not.
      Since it is compared to <b>leng,</b> which is a verb of motion,
      my money is on <b>ve&#39;</b> being one too.<br>
    </p>
    <pre class=3D"m_-2718200775927719260moz-signature" cols=3D"72">--=20
SuStel
<a class=3D"m_-2718200775927719260moz-txt-link-freetext" href=3D"http://tri=
mboli.name" target=3D"_blank">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </div>

<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a=
><br>
<a href=3D"http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel=3D"n=
oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhinga=
n-hol-kli.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>

--94eb2c1cba5a4f1284055397b9de--

--===============4860963029588483498==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============4860963029588483498==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post