[109435] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Klingon Word of the Day: bon

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Boozer)
Mon Apr 10 09:59:09 2017

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 13:59:06 +0000
In-Reply-To: <3d2b13d78e953d7389df1b3476f06cc5@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

> Klingon Word of the Day for Sunday, April 09, 2017
> =

> Klingon word: bon
> Part of speech: verb
> Definition: share with
> Source: qepHom 2016

Lieven reported this new word on 11/07/2017:

---begin quote---

There are two words for "share."

When A shares something (C) with B, the verb to use is {bon} ("share with")=
 and the construction is {B-vaD C bon A} (with appropriate verb prefixes de=
pending on what A and C are). In this case, C belongs to or is controlled b=
y A and A chooses to share it with B.

When A and B share something with each other (share some {qagh}, say), the =
verb to use is {lIn} "share") and the construction is {C lulIn A B je} (or =
{C lIn A B je} if C is plural, and, again, with appropriate verb prefixes).=
 In this case, the speaker is noncommittal about whether A or B is the one =
who decided to do the sharing with the other.

There is an idiomatic expression: {lInchuq} "share each other."

This is not a euphemism, but Maltz admitted it's a little risqu=E9. {lInchu=
q} ("they share each other") means that they (whoever is being talked about=
) have a physical relationship of some sort. The phrase is general - it doe=
sn't imply anything about exactly what they do physically. It also doesn't =
necessarily mean that they are doing something right now (at the time of sp=
eaking).

The relationship could be relatively light (a little nibbling) or heavier (=
really biting) or beyond (Maltz thought that Terrans might find that part a=
 bit risqu=E9).
	=

As with other verbs with {-chuq}, the prefix has to indicate a plural subje=
ct and no object:
   {malInchuq}
   {SulInchuq}

---end Okrand's quote---

By the way, Okrand was surprised when I pointed at him that {bon} is {nob} =
("give") backwards. It was definitely not intentional. =


(but I think it's a good way to memorize.)

--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI

---end Lieven's quote---



--
Voragh
tlhIngan ghantoH pIn'a'
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons



_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post