[109152] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] {bom} and {ghuQ}: a Klingon perspective
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Mon Mar 6 10:34:37 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:34:33 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20170305235038.3B78B8DB14DF@zapata.dreamhost.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
Am 06.03.2017 um 00:49 schrieb sustel@trimboli.name:
> What interests me most about this message is that Okrand seems to name
> the libretto of =91u=92 as a canonical source.
Message from Okrand:
> A *bom*'s lyrics (*bom* *mu'mey*) need not rhyme, though they can and
> often do. (The libretto to the opera *'u'* has very little if any rhymin=
g.)
Does this really seem that he names it being a canon source?
-- =
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Paqbatlh
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
