[109121] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] -lI': intentional or not?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Wed Mar 1 06:56:05 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:55:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmO1u670Q5cn5ahrZBA9WqqfkXEHqWfm-3893KZJbEfupA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
Am 01.03.2017 um 10:25 schrieb De'vID:
> What is a "suicide mission", if not a plan of attack/defense where
> one's intention is to die? (See KGT p.49 where it talks about {-neS}
> and {-chu'} with verbs of fighting.)
Alright, you have convinced me in this, that a suicide attack contains
intentional dying. This does actually confirm what I felt, that
{Heghta'} implies intentional dying and therefore can certainly only be
used with a suicide.
As SuStel wrote, {Heghta' targh} makes no sense. (Yeah, only when the
Targ died intentionally, but we've had that already :-) )
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Type7VerbSuffixes
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
