[109118] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Rendered fat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Tue Feb 28 22:58:07 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:57:30 -0500
In-Reply-To: <58b6155d.91816b0a.ca9ba.6e98@mx.google.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
On 2/28/2017 7:27 PM, Christa Hansberry wrote:
> Why? I've found the discussion helpful.
>
> -QISta'
>
> Enviado desde mi tel=E9fono inal=E1mbrico Verizon
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> De: "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name>
> Fecha: mar., feb. 28, 2017 05:35
> Asunto: [tlhIngan Hol] Rendered fat
> Para: <tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org>
>
> On 2/28/2017 12:39 AM, Ed Bailey wrote:
> > What it comes down to is what his thoughts are. So I very much want to
> > hear what he has to say about *-lu'wI'*, and anyone else's reasoning,
> > particularly my own, is no substitute.
>
> Then it's a bit unfair of you to argue with us about it on the list.
He's arguing his hypothesis but automatically rejecting anything anyone =
else has to say. If your opinion is that only Okrand can opine usefully =
on this, then say so and bow out.
-- =
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
