[109094] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] -lI': intentional or not?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Mon Feb 27 06:02:40 2017
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:02:45 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmOxsxLUeLRCK-L8Tmxt+eOCs31UHvhRsafipi4zo_aFtA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
Am 27.02.2017 um 11:59 schrieb De'vID:
> {-ta'} indicates intention behind the action, but it doesn't
> necessarily indicate intention on the part of the subject of the verb.
> {pumta' nagh} is fine, if someone pushed the stone intentionally.
Is this clearly defined, or is it your interpretation?
(I'm not being mean, this is a serious neutral question) :-)
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
