[108636] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] to qaStaHvIS or not to qaStaHvIS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Tue Dec 27 15:07:15 2016
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:06:42 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2c+VkNwcr6zGP_y=ipQJ4e04iUmUt0qVVRGqSoTU103vhA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
On 12/27/2016 2:50 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
> ok, scratch that. even with the {wa'maH DIS} we would need the
> {qaStaHvIS}.
>
> however, if I wrote {wa'maH DIS vorgh} then the {qaStaHvIS} would be
> unnecessary, right ?
Still need it.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
