[108524] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] paq'batlh mu'tlhegh
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Tue Dec 20 13:39:11 2016
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CABSTb1d1Kc0vkNW_aJ1zmSRa=wkVUmY1W8mg0StLjr6aX6-ZXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:32:58 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============1897939969905211568==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d2a7803d75905441b4498
--001a113d2a7803d75905441b4498
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Dec 19, 2016 16:25, "Ed Bailey" <bellerophon.modeler@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:07 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
maj. however, how would you explain tkd's {jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'}, and
> in particular the placement of {naDev} after the {jIHtaHbogh} and not
> before it ?
>
>
My explanation is that to expect the {naDev} to be required to precede
{jIHtaHbogh} is an overgeneralization of the rule that places nouns +
{-Daq} and location nouns like {naDev} before the verb.
In the examples from TKD and paq'batlh, {naDev} does follow the verb,
Which example from the paq'batlh?
--
De'vID
--001a113d2a7803d75905441b4498
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><div data-smartmail=3D"gmail_signature" dir=3D"auto"><br>=
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote=
">On Dec 19, 2016 16:25, "Ed Bailey" <<a href=3D"mailto:beller=
ophon.modeler@gmail.com">bellerophon.modeler@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br ty=
pe=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b=
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"=
quoted-text">On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:07 AM, mayqel qunenoS <span dir=3D"l=
tr"><<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmai=
l.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gma=
il_quote"><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px=
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"l=
tr">maj. however, how would you explain tkd's {jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe=
'}, and in particular the placement of {naDev} after the {jIHtaHbogh} a=
nd not before it ?</p><span></span><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div><=
div class=3D"gmail_extra">My explanation is that to expect the {naDev} to b=
e required to precede {jIHtaHbogh} is an overgeneralization of the rule tha=
t places nouns + {-Daq} and location nouns like {naDev} before the verb.<br=
><br>In the examples from TKD and paq'batlh, {naDev} does follow the ve=
rb, </div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div d=
ir=3D"auto">Which example from the paq'batlh?</div><div dir=3D"auto"><b=
r></div><div dir=3D"auto">--=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto">De'vID</div><=
div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra" dir=3D"auto"><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b=
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"=
gmail_extra"><br></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>
--001a113d2a7803d75905441b4498--
--===============1897939969905211568==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============1897939969905211568==--
