[108471] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] paq'batlh mu'tlhegh
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Sat Dec 17 15:31:43 2016
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 15:31:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2c+kTntDfkEfkDSSbG_gW6qKmjx7ZwAooE7B6VzddMw__g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0933429404793118533==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------7F8FF5772C7D02ABCB38263C"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------7F8FF5772C7D02ABCB38263C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 12/17/2016 1:40 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
>
> ok, I read it; {jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'}.
>
> however based on what I know, I can't analyze it. "here which I am
> being I don't know it". shouldn't the {naDev} always come first ? and
> what is its role in that sentence ? is it the subject of the
> {jIHtaHbogh}, the object of {vISovbe'}, or both ?
>
> as I wrote earlier in this thread, I am obviously missing something
> here, and by the looks of it, it must be something pretty important..
>
I've never heard a satisfactory analysis of the sentence either. But
Okrand obviously has one to use the *jIHtaHbogh* word more than once.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
--------------7F8FF5772C7D02ABCB38263C
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/17/2016 1:40 PM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+kTntDfkEfkDSSbG_gW6qKmjx7ZwAooE7B6VzddMw__g@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr">ok, I read it; {jIHtaHbogh naDev vISovbe'}.</p>
<p dir="ltr">however based on what I know, I can't analyze it.
"here which I am being I don't know it". shouldn't the {naDev}
always come first ? and what is its role in that sentence ? is
it the subject of the {jIHtaHbogh}, the object of {vISovbe'}, or
both ?</p>
<p dir="ltr">as I wrote earlier in this thread, I am obviously
missing something here, and by the looks of it, it must be
something pretty important..</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>I've never heard a satisfactory analysis of the sentence either.
But Okrand obviously has one to use the <b>jIHtaHbogh</b> word
more than once.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------7F8FF5772C7D02ABCB38263C--
--===============0933429404793118533==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============0933429404793118533==--
