[108374] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Adjective suffixes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunenoS)
Tue Dec 13 07:44:44 2016
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CABDLMbWyjUEc9qkdCiZQW1y-kLW=piEczsW0qrMJKOCJzxeqtA@mail.gmail.com>
From: mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 14:44:41 +0200
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============8391925592233236470==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0480da84c0160543899574
--94eb2c0480da84c0160543899574
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ok, thanks !
however, it is a pity {Duj tInba'} isn't allowed. it would be wonderful to
be able to say "the obviously big ship".
qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
On 13 Dec 2016 10:46 am, "Andr=C3=A9 M=C3=BCller" <esperantist@gmail.com> w=
rote:
> Somewhere (TKD I suppose) it's written that the only suffixes following a
> verb used as an adjective can be the negation suffixes {-be', -Ha'} and t=
he
> intensifier {-qu'}. I think it's logical that both can occur together. So=
I
> have no doubts that you can say {Duj tInqu'be'} with the intended meaning=
.
>
> But other suffixes are excluded, do the answer to question 2 is no. It is
> easily understood, but ungrammatical.
>
> - Andr=C3=A9
>
> On 13 Dec 2016 08:18, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've been meaning to ask..
>
> 1st question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, more
> than one rover-type suffix ? Can we write {Duj tInqu'be'} for "not
> very big ship" ?
>
> 2nd question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, a
> non-rover suffix ? Can I write {Duj tInba'} for "obviously big ship" ?
>
> qunnoH jan puqloD
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
--94eb2c0480da84c0160543899574
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr">ok, thanks !</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">however, it is a pity {Duj tInba'} isn't allowed. it=
would be wonderful to be able to say "the obviously big ship".</=
p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">qunnoH jan puqloD<br>
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 13 Dec 2016 10=
:46 am, "Andr=C3=A9 M=C3=BCller" <<a href=3D"mailto:esperantis=
t@gmail.com">esperantist@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><=
blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px=
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"auto">Somewhere (TKD I suppose) i=
t's written that the only suffixes following a verb used as an adjectiv=
e can be the negation suffixes {-be', -Ha'} and the intensifier {-q=
u'}. I think it's logical that both can occur together. So I have n=
o doubts that you can say {Duj tInqu'be'} with the intended meaning=
.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">But other suffixes are exclu=
ded, do the answer to question 2 is no. It is easily understood, but ungram=
matical.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">- Andr=C3=A9</d=
iv></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 13 De=
c 2016 08:18, "mayqel qunenoS" <<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gmai=
l.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attrib=
ution"><blockquote class=3D"m_6037730892873398978quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I've been meaning =
to ask..<br>
<br>
1st question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, more<br>
than one rover-type suffix ? Can we write {Duj tInqu'be'} for "=
;not<br>
very big ship" ?<br>
<br>
2nd question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, a<br>
non-rover suffix ? Can I write {Duj tInba'} for "obviously big shi=
p" ?<br>
<br>
qunnoH jan puqloD<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org" target=3D"_blank">tlhIngan-Ho=
l@lists.kli.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel=3D"n=
oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhinga=
n-hol-kli.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org">tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org</a=
><br>
<a href=3D"http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org" rel=3D"n=
oreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.<wbr>cgi/tlhinga=
n-hol-kli.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div></div>
--94eb2c0480da84c0160543899574--
--===============8391925592233236470==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============8391925592233236470==--
