[102907] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Aspect, etc
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Sat Dec 5 05:53:41 2015
In-Reply-To: <CAFK8js20QsrCxTpVaeOF_D4jV7ve6xzpm=cCTKLbNw2o3N09Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 11:53:23 +0100
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
ghunchu'wI':
> So I think my most promising course of action is this: I will continue
> to use aspect suffixes the way I have been using them, which I still
> think is consistent with the examples I know.
I think the disagreement is mostly "technical" or "academic", as they
say. For the vast majority of things that people are likely to want to
talk about, the two interpretations will actually coincide in the
output they produce, and are mutually intelligible where they don't.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
