[102441] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Zero prefix at a verb,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Thu Nov 19 10:04:17 2015
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cKi_wPFFWi2dy4Ln0JmPjWZABwD7MJ5-5BW=uKGMBxFxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:04:00 +0100
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
On 19 November 2015 at 15:58, qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> In TKD p.29 the following sentences/translations are written :
>
> lujpu' jIH'e' (It is *I* who have failed)
> lujpu' jIH (I have failed)
>
> Before noticing this,I would expect these sentences to be written :
>
> jIlujpu' jIH'e'
> jIlujpu' jIH
>
> So,I guess that according to canon grammar,a verb existing before a pronoun
> takes the zero prefix.
>
> Is this rule,being mentioned anywhere else in Canon,or is it shown only in
> these examples of TKD ?
This is widely considered to be an error in TKD.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
