[102425] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] KLBC : Sentences as objects
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Holt)
Wed Nov 18 17:14:50 2015
From: David Holt <kenjutsuka@live.com>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:14:32 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAFK8js1R327jyf3Az2wAzrHnWQEC1VbZfVHjQpVkgVfMgXHjjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
Good point! When I originally read it I had noted what I assumed was a missing {bo-}. When he corrected himself, I forgot to ask myself if there was a way that it made sense with {Su-} and just corrected it to {bo-}. The evidence of his own correction certainly leads us to believe he is using {Hoch} as an address and, in that case, I have certainly misunderstood and I agree that {Su-} would indeed be correct. DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'.
janSIy
________________________________________
From: Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 3:49 PM
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] KLBC : Sentences as objects
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:45 PM, David Holt <kenjutsuka@live.com> wrote:
> ...It should actually be {bo-} since you have the object {Hoch}.
If he's using {Hoch} as direct address instead of an object, then it's
fine as is. It depends on whether the intended mean is "because you
answered everything, I salute you" or "hey everybody -- because you
answered, I salute you."
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
