[102133] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qa'vam?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Felix Malmenbeck)
Tue Nov 10 00:37:20 2015

From: Felix Malmenbeck <felixm@kth.se>
To: Rohan Fenwick <qeslagh@hotmail.com>, "tlhingan-hol@kli.org"
 <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 05:36:43 +0000
In-Reply-To: <BAY179-W23B9D510D062D8B24DD066AA140@phx.gbl>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org

--===============4326901471123298016==
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_000_144713380439552695kthse_"

--_000_144713380439552695kthse_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> My first instinct says no, but then it makes me think of those times

> where I've seen {bI'reS} used as a time stamp roughly equivalent to

> "at first", and though we have no canon for it [...]


We do, actually, from paq'batlh (paq'raD, Canto 18):


bI'reS qeylIS vaq molor


(Don't have the English translation handy, but it's something like "At firs=
t, Molor taunts Kahless.")

It is worth noting, however, that paq'batlh is poetic by nature.


It is a pet theory of mine that bI'reS is actually an old word for "beginni=
ng", which survives in modern (that is, future) tlhIngan Hol through opera.

However, that is speculation upon speculation, wrapped in speculation (made=
 from 100% organic speculation).


________________________________
From: Rohan Fenwick <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 06:02
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Subject: Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qa'vam?

ghItlhpu' naHQun, jatlh:
> How would y'all use {qa'vam}?
> Can I use it as a time stamp?

Ooo. That's a fascinating question. My first instinct says no, but then it =
makes me think of those times where I've seen {bI'reS} used as a time stamp=
 roughly equivalent to "at first", and though we have no canon for it, I do=
 like that usage. Similarly, if {qa'vam} appears in the right place syntact=
ically, I guess there's no reason it couldn't be interpreted as "in the beg=
inning" (in the biblical sense) or "at the birth of the universe". I don't =
know how many contexts you could use it in - it's a pretty narrow meaning -=
 but by the same token, {qaStaHvIS qa'vam} doesn't sound quite right to me =
either.

I suppose it depends how long you want to draw your bow. It's questionable =
but interesting.

QeS 'utlh

--_000_144713380439552695kthse_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-=
1">
<style type=3D"text/css" style=3D"display:none"><!--P{margin-top:0;margin-b=
ottom:0;} .hmmessage p=0A=
	{margin:0px;=0A=
	padding:0px}=0A=
body.hmmessage=0A=
	{font-size:12pt;=0A=
	font-family:Calibri}--></style>
</head>
<body dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"font-size:12pt;color:#000000;background-color:#F=
FFFFF;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">
<p><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span =
dir=3D"ltr">&gt; My first instinct says no, but then it makes me think of t=
hose times</span></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span =
dir=3D"ltr">&gt; where I've seen {bI'reS} used as a time stamp roughly equi=
valent to</span></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span =
dir=3D"ltr">&gt; &quot;at first&quot;, and though we have no canon for it [=
...]</span></span></font></p>
<p><br>
<font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span dir=
=3D"ltr"></span></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span =
dir=3D"ltr">We do, actually, from paq'batlh (paq'raD, Canto 18):</span></sp=
an></font></p>
<p><br>
<font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span dir=
=3D"ltr"></span></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span =
dir=3D"ltr">bI'reS qeylIS vaq molor</span></span></font></p>
<p><br>
<font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span dir=
=3D"ltr"></span></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span =
dir=3D"ltr">(Don't have the English translation handy, but it's something l=
ike &quot;At first, Molor taunts Kahless.&quot;)<br>
<br>
It is worth noting, however, that paq'batlh is poetic by nature.</span></sp=
an></font></p>
<p><br>
<font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span dir=
=3D"ltr"></span></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span =
dir=3D"ltr">It is a pet theory of mine that bI'reS is actually an old word =
for &quot;beginning&quot;, which survives in modern (that is, future) tlhIn=
gan Hol through opera.</span></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span =
dir=3D"ltr">However, that is speculation upon speculation, wrapped in specu=
lation (made from 100% organic speculation).</span></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Calibri"><span style=3D"font-size:12pt;"><span =
dir=3D"ltr"></span></span></font><br>
</p>
<div style=3D"color: rgb(33, 33, 33);">
<hr tabindex=3D"-1" style=3D"display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id=3D"divRplyFwdMsg" dir=3D"ltr"><font style=3D"font-size:11pt" color=
=3D"#000000" face=3D"Calibri, sans-serif"><b>From:</b> Rohan Fenwick &lt;qe=
slagh@hotmail.com&gt;<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, November 10, 2015 06:02<br>
<b>To:</b> tlhingan-hol@kli.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qa'vam?</font>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir=3D"ltr">ghItlhpu' naHQun, jatlh:<br>
&gt; How would y'all use {qa'vam}?
<div>
<div dir=3D"ltr">
<div>&gt; Can I use it as a time stamp?<br>
<br>
Ooo. That's a fascinating question. My first instinct says no, but then it =
makes me think of those times where I've seen {bI'reS} used as a time stamp=
 roughly equivalent to &quot;at first&quot;, and though we have no canon fo=
r it, I do like that usage. Similarly, if
 {qa'vam} appears in the right place syntactically, I guess there's no reas=
on it couldn't be interpreted as &quot;in the beginning&quot; (in the bibli=
cal sense) or &quot;at the birth of the universe&quot;. I don't know how ma=
ny contexts you could use it in - it's a pretty narrow
 meaning - but by the same token, {qaStaHvIS qa'vam} doesn't sound quite ri=
ght to me either.<br>
<br>
I suppose it depends how long you want to draw your bow. It's questionable =
but interesting.<br>
<br>
QeS 'utlh<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_144713380439552695kthse_--


--===============4326901471123298016==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

--===============4326901471123298016==--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post