[102074] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] How many grammarians ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick)
Mon Nov 9 08:45:21 2015
From: Rohan Fenwick <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:45:05 +1000
In-Reply-To: <56409EE1.9070200@trimboli.name>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
--===============6922912556559451508==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_1e8c9ed5-e536-499e-8640-156860886240_"
--_1e8c9ed5-e536-499e-8640-156860886240_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ghItlhpu' Anthony=2C jatlh:
> Have there been any examples where two people (in writing=2C or in
> talking) have had to communicate in Klingon because it was the only
> language which both knew well?
jang SuStel=2C jatlh:
> I've wished for this for a long time=2C but I don't think it's ever=20
> happened. Even though there are other language editions of The Klingon=20
> Dictionary=2C and there is a German mailing list=2C it's virtually a=20
> requirement to speak English to learn Klingon.
chaq pImbogh wa' nuv tu'lu': chaDQI' 'oH pongDaj'e'. nIpon Dab. QInmeyDajDa=
q DIvI' Hol mu'mey'e' rut lo'=2C 'ach KLI QIn tetlhvaD QummeH not DIvI' Hol=
lo' ghaH. chaq tlhIngan Hol qeq 'e' maS. chaq DIvI' Hol'e' po'qu'be'. jISo=
vbe' jIH. 'ach jISaHbe' je jIH=2C tlhIngan Hol jatlhlaHqu'ba'mo' chaDQI'. v=
aj juquvmoH=2C chaDQI'=2C 'ej naDev bIjeSmo' mabelbej.
One potential exception may be chaDQI'=2C who is Japanese and from their em=
ails clearly speaks some English=2C but hasn't ever corresponded with the l=
ist in English. Whether this is because chaDQI' prefers to practise Klingon=
on the one hand=2C or doesn't have such good English on the other=2C I don=
't know=2C but either way we are honoured to have chaDQI' with us.
QeS 'utlh
=
--_1e8c9ed5-e536-499e-8640-156860886240_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>ghItlhpu' Anthony=2C jatlh:<br>&=
gt=3B Have there been any examples where two people (in writing=2C or in<br=
><div>>=3B talking) have had to communicate in Klingon because it was the=
only<br>>=3B language which both knew well?<br><br>jang SuStel=2C jatlh:=
<br>>=3B I've wished for this for a long time=2C but I don't think it's e=
ver <br>>=3B happened. Even though there are other language editions of T=
he Klingon <br>>=3B Dictionary=2C and there is a German mailing list=2C i=
t's virtually a <br>>=3B requirement to speak English to learn Klingon.<b=
r><br>chaq pImbogh wa' nuv tu'lu': chaDQI' 'oH pongDaj'e'. nIpon Dab. QInme=
yDajDaq DIvI' Hol mu'mey'e' rut lo'=2C 'ach KLI QIn tetlhvaD QummeH not DIv=
I' Hol lo' ghaH. chaq tlhIngan Hol qeq 'e' maS. chaq DIvI' Hol'e' po'qu'be'=
. jISovbe' jIH. 'ach jISaHbe' je jIH=2C tlhIngan Hol jatlhlaHqu'ba'mo' chaD=
QI'. vaj juquvmoH=2C chaDQI'=2C 'ej naDev bIjeSmo' mabelbej.<br><br>One pot=
ential exception may be chaDQI'=2C who is Japanese and from their emails cl=
early speaks some English=2C but hasn't ever corresponded with the list in =
English. Whether this is because chaDQI' prefers to practise Klingon on the=
one hand=2C or doesn't have such good English on the other=2C I don't know=
=2C but either way we are honoured to have chaDQI' with us.<br><br>QeS 'utl=
h<br></div> </div></body>
</html>=
--_1e8c9ed5-e536-499e-8640-156860886240_--
--===============6922912556559451508==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============6922912556559451508==--
