[101949] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] wovmoHbogh jan
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (qunnoQ HoD)
Thu Nov 5 13:54:32 2015
In-Reply-To: <CAMZYS2UeecTq9EokZWjedQ3=OgZu_tJuJ9vL+J-vK7kNSOUJNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 20:54:15 +0200
From: qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
--===============6421621931940557725==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f6dfe4e29810523cfa7d9
--001a113f6dfe4e29810523cfa7d9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I thought too,that {wovmoHbogh jan} is a word made of more words,but still
I thought it would be it in KLI's list,because there are there other
compound words too.
cpt qunnoQ
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Michael Roney, Jr. <nahqun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:53 PM, qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > i just noticed this..
> >
> > there is this word {wovmoHbogh jan},which's sources are listed as
> hallmark commercial and msn.
> >
> > so far so good.
> >
> > when i checked whether {wovmoHbogh jan} is included in the "new klingon
> words (not in the original lexicon)" section of KLI,i saw that it isn't.
> >
> > on the other hand the word {cheb} (which's source is msn too) is
> included in KLI's "new klingon words list".
> >
> > i thought that EVERY canon word,which wasn't included in TKD,and KGT was
> in KLI's "new klingon words list".
> >
> > ?????????
>
> {wovmoHbogh jan} is two words; {wovmoHbogh} and {jan}.
> {wov} is a verb from TKD.
> {jan} is a noun from TKD
>
> {wov} is using two suffixes here, {-moH} and {-bogh}, both from TKD.
>
> All together which means something like "device which causes it to be
> bright".
>
> ~naHQun
>
> --
> ~Michael Roney, Jr.
> Freelance Translator
>
--001a113f6dfe4e29810523cfa7d9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I thought too,that {wovmoHbogh jan} is a word made of=
more words,but still I thought it would be it in KLI's list,because th=
ere are there other compound words too.<br><br></div>cpt qunnoQ<br></div><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 5, 2015=
at 8:11 PM, Michael Roney, Jr. <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:nah=
qun@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">nahqun@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><span class=3D""><br><br>On=
Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:53 PM, qunnoQ HoD <<a href=3D"mailto:mihkoun@gma=
il.com" target=3D"_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> =
i just noticed this..<br>><br>> there is this word {wovmoHbogh jan},w=
hich's sources are listed as hallmark commercial and msn.<br>><br>&g=
t; so far so good.<br>><br>> when i checked whether {wovmoHbogh jan} =
is included in the "new klingon words (not in the original lexicon)&qu=
ot; section of KLI,i saw that it isn't.<br>><br>> on the other ha=
nd the word {cheb} (which's source is msn too) is included in KLI's=
"new klingon words list".<br>><br>> i thought that EVERY c=
anon word,which wasn't included in TKD,and KGT was in KLI's "n=
ew klingon words list".<br>><br>> ?????????<br><br></span>{wovmo=
Hbogh jan} is two words; {wovmoHbogh} and {jan}.<div>{wov} is a verb from T=
KD.</div><div>{jan} is a noun from TKD</div><div><br></div><div>{wov} is us=
ing two suffixes here, {-moH} and {-bogh}, both from TKD.</div><div><br></d=
iv><div>All together which means something like "device which causes i=
t to be bright".<br><br>~naHQun<br><br>--<br>~Michael Roney, Jr.<br>Fr=
eelance Translator</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a113f6dfe4e29810523cfa7d9--
--===============6421621931940557725==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============6421621931940557725==--
