[101941] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] AFAIK never used in a sentence
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fiat Knox)
Thu Nov 5 10:39:09 2015
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC)
From: Fiat Knox <fiat_knox@yahoo.co.uk>
To: qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com>,
tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cJsF5hx87KS2HYj=KR+vzjdRk60obH7okRG8Ra2nR-f9A@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Fiat Knox <fiat_knox@yahoo.co.uk>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
--===============7838435427110334644==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_555132_922007347.1446737933188"
Content-Length: 4401
------=_Part_555132_922007347.1446737933188
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The consensus is that if Maltz says it, it's canon. It's just that if it's =
not been used in a sentence, there are no examples to give to show usage.
Examples of words from TKD which never appeared in canon sentences include =
vo'=C2=A0propel, bav=C2=A0orbit=C2=A0and lolSeHcha=C2=A0attitude control th=
rusters. There are others. But they are definitely canon.
=20
On Thursday, 5 November 2015, 15:14, qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote=
:
=20
=20
i have noticed that numerous times,at the discussion which follows the "wo=
rd of the day" the following phrase comes up :
"..as far as i know,it (the word of the day) has never been used in a sente=
nce (by okrand).."
i would like to ask,what is the practical significance of the fact that a w=
ord may have been never used in sentence ; does this make it less "canon" ?
cpt. qunnoQ
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
=20
------=_Part_555132_922007347.1446737933188
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head></head><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; f=
ont-family:Courier New, courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif;font-size:16=
px"><div id=3D"yiv7063289051"><div id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1446736492056_6814"><=
div style=3D"color:#000;background-color:#fff;font-family:Courier New, cour=
ier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif;font-size:16px;" id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_1446=
736492056_6813"><div dir=3D"ltr" id=3D"yiv7063289051yui_3_16_0_1_1446736492=
056_4159">The consensus is that if Maltz says it, it's canon. It's just tha=
t if it's not been used in a sentence, there are no examples to give to sho=
w usage.<br></div><div dir=3D"ltr" id=3D"yiv7063289051yui_3_16_0_1_14467364=
92056_4159">Examples of words from TKD which never appeared in canon senten=
ces include <b>vo'</b> <i>propel</i>, <b>bav</b> <i id=3D"yui_3_1=
6_0_1_1446736492056_6895">orbit</i> and <b>lolSeHcha</b> <i>attit=
ude control thrusters</i>. There are others. But they are definitely canon.=
</div><div class=3D"yiv7063289051qtdSeparateBR" id=3D"yui_3_16_0_1_14467364=
92056_6896"><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none"></div></div></div></div><=
div class=3D".yiv7063289051yahoo_quoted"> <div style=3D"font-family:Courier=
New, courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"> <div style=
=3D"font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Gra=
nde, Sans-Serif;font-size:16px;"> <div class=3D"qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></di=
v><div class=3D"yiv7063289051yqt3551681283" id=3D"yiv7063289051yqt14282"><d=
iv dir=3D"ltr"> <font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"> On Thursday, 5 November 20=
15, 15:14, qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:<br clear=3D"none"> <=
/font> </div> <blockquote style=3D"border-left:2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255);m=
argin-left:5px;margin-top:5px;padding-left:5px;"> <br clear=3D"none"><br c=
lear=3D"none"> <div class=3D"yiv7063289051y_msg_container"><div id=3D"yiv70=
63289051"><div dir=3D"ltr">i have noticed that numerous times,at the discus=
sion which follows the "word of the day" the following phrase comes up :<br=
clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none">"..as far as i know,it (the word of the =
day) has never been used in a sentence (by okrand).."<br clear=3D"none"><br=
clear=3D"none">i would like to ask,what is the practical significance of t=
he fact that a word may have been never used in sentence ; does this make i=
t less "canon" ?<br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none">cpt. qunnoQ<br clear=
=3D"none"></div></div><br clear=3D"none">__________________________________=
_____________<br clear=3D"none">Tlhingan-hol mailing list<br clear=3D"none"=
><a rel=3D"nofollow" shape=3D"rect" ymailto=3D"mailto:Tlhingan-hol@kli.org"=
target=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:Tlhingan-hol@kli.org">Tlhingan-hol@kli.or=
g</a><br clear=3D"none"><a rel=3D"nofollow" shape=3D"rect" target=3D"_blank=
" href=3D"http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol">http://mail.kl=
i.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol</a><br clear=3D"none"><br clear=3D"none=
"><br clear=3D"none"></div> </blockquote></div> </div> </div> </div></di=
v></body></html>
------=_Part_555132_922007347.1446737933188--
--===============7838435427110334644==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============7838435427110334644==--
