[101839] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Significance of constructed languages
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (DloraH)
Mon Nov 2 19:09:39 2015
From: "DloraH" <seruq@bellsouth.net>
To: <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:09:25 -0600
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cLD6FNyMprqAvqBbigJui1cJmQXO0znCG2wuZYzW-gj3A@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
> > Technically, you COULD use {-ghach} on a bare verb, but
> > you'd really only do it as a joke or some other intentionally
> > ungrammatical construction, to call attention to the word in
> > some oddly special way. Nobody does it in normal
> > conversation. It ain't no citified way to speak proper Klingon.
>
>
> ok, I understand. thank you.
If you find yourself wanting to use -ghach on a bare verb, consider reforming the sentence so that
the verb stays a verb. Get away from the noun centric English, and think in Klingon, using
"action".
-- DloraH
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
