[101784] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Significance of constructed languages
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Sun Nov 1 12:57:12 2015
In-Reply-To: <CAP7F2cJCz+qVWHVi-ViWWSfLi6YupQXFzNUT+kr9iXz3_srk7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 18:56:56 +0100
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
On 1 November 2015 at 14:35, qunnoQ HoD <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know this must be terrible,but I have to start trying writing in Klingon..
yIHon'eghQo'.
> Holmey lumutlhlu' lo'laHghach
> Holmey lumutlhlu' lo'laHghach yajbe' vInDa'pu'.
DIp DachenmoH 'e' DaHechchugh, {-bogh} yIlIjQo'. {Holmey lumutlhlu'} =
"languages are constructed"; {Holmey lumutlhlu'bogh} = "languages
which are constructed".
> nItebHa' nuqem.
qechlIj vIyajchu' 'ach qechvam 'oSbe' mu'tlheghlIj.
{nItebHa' nuqem} = "together, they bring us", "they (acting together) bring us".
nuqDaq nuqem?
{nughomchoHmoH} qoj {nuyIrchoHmoH} 'e' DaHechba'.
> vInDa'pu' pIm. HatlhmeyDaq pIm. Hatlhmeyvo' pIm. nughmeyvo' pIm.
mu'tlheghmey naQ bIHbe'. Dach wot'a'.
> Hol ngIq chenmoHlu' jatlhlaH tera'nganpu'
{ngIq Hol chenmoHlu'bogh}.
> does this make any sense whatsoever ?
HIja'. majQa'. pab qellu'DI' loQ bIQagh 'ach qechmeylIj vIyajchu'.
--
De'vID
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
