[101694] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] new words qepHom 2015 (was Re: Underwater work
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rohan Fenwick)
Fri Oct 30 10:52:46 2015
From: Rohan Fenwick <qeslagh@hotmail.com>
To: "tlhingan-hol@kli.org" <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 00:52:31 +1000
In-Reply-To: <CALPi+eQWQeym4yi1AWS_KC_E1bYhOrCemc=ghZPpiL6ov0h27w@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
--===============7386765762172495590==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_8901d006-3756-40ce-9c4c-52c1cc001709_"
--_8901d006-3756-40ce-9c4c-52c1cc001709_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ghItlhpu' qurgh=2C jatlh:
> They should all be on the KLI's New Word list now: http://www.kli.org/abo=
ut-klingon/new-klingon-words/date/
maj. tlho'=2C qurgh.
I confess I'm particularly thrilled to see the nouns {Su'nIm} and {vem}. Th=
e ideas of traces=2C tracks=2C spoor=2C or trails - in fact=2C virtually an=
y type of evidence of an object's prior presence in a place - have been a l=
exical gap for which straightforward renditions have generally stymied me f=
or some years. Fingerprints=2C footprints=2C tyre tracks=2C even ion trails=
. In fact=2C I remember specifically raising them at the wishlist session a=
t qep'a' 2011=2C my first qep'a'. So in a sense=2C I feel these are almost =
like Maltz granting my own specific wish. I feel like a kid at Christmas. :=
D
The phonological form of the word {vem} also gives us the possibility of th=
e rhyming construction {bem vem} for "footprint"=2C which I think is kind o=
f poetic.
QeS 'utlh
=
--_8901d006-3756-40ce-9c4c-52c1cc001709_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px=3B
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt=3B
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class=3D'hmmessage'><div dir=3D'ltr'>ghItlhpu' qurgh=2C jatlh:<br>>=
=3B They should all be on the KLI's New Word list now: =3B<a href=3D"ht=
tp://www.kli.org/about-klingon/new-klingon-words/date/" target=3D"_blank">h=
ttp://www.kli.org/about-klingon/new-klingon-words/date/</a><br><br>maj. tlh=
o'=2C qurgh.<br><br>I confess I'm particularly thrilled to see the nouns {S=
u'nIm} and {vem}. The ideas of traces=2C tracks=2C spoor=2C or trails - in =
fact=2C virtually any type of evidence of an object's prior presence in a p=
lace - have been a lexical gap for which straightforward renditions have ge=
nerally stymied me for some years. Fingerprints=2C footprints=2C tyre track=
s=2C even ion trails. In fact=2C I remember specifically raising them at th=
e wishlist session at qep'a' 2011=2C my first qep'a'. So in a sense=2C I fe=
el these are almost like Maltz granting my own specific wish. I feel like a=
kid at Christmas. :D<br><br>The phonological form of the word {vem} also g=
ives us the possibility of the rhyming construction {bem vem} for "footprin=
t"=2C which I think is kind of poetic.<br><br>QeS 'utlh<br> </di=
v></body>
</html>=
--_8901d006-3756-40ce-9c4c-52c1cc001709_--
--===============7386765762172495590==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
--===============7386765762172495590==--
