[101000] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] qep'a' report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Thu Aug 6 06:30:50 2015
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:29:59 +0200
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
To: "tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org"
<tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR06MB5396D28450F45F38703152B91750@CO2PR06MB539.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
Thanks Qov for this report, it gives the non-attendees to get some =
information and get a short feeling of being at the qep'a' :-)
Am 05.08.2015 um 22:44 schrieb Robyn Stewart:
> There are Klingon lines that he wrote but that were not used in the
> previous Star Trek movie and he was unsure whether the NDA would allow
> him to reveal them to us.
Same for the 2009 movie: Okrand said that the lines were not in the =
movie, so he would not give them.
> He explained again that some of the tlhIngan Hol in Into Darkness had to
> be created to match the lip movements of someone speaking already
> created Klingon lines, WITH THE VIDEO PLAYED BACKWARDS!
For those interested, here's some more information from an interview:
http://www.qephom.de/e/okrand_about_into_darkness.html
> He said that a leak could be said to be was the reason he was called in
> to rework the Vulcan lines for Star Trek II. Because the news of Spock=92s
> death leaked, they inserted the scene at the beginning where he =93dies=
=94
> in the Kobayashi Maru scenario. That meant that in the next scene with
> Spock and Saavik, Saavik=92s character had already met Kirk, so her line
> had to be changed. Enter Marc.
REally interesting, I hadn't heard that part of the story yet. On needs =
to mention thought that that scene was first recorder in English, and =
the vulcan was added later.
> informal hallway conversation. Note that this was a conversation with
> Marc, not matlh, so not canon.
Wehn Marc is not prepared for grammatical questions, he ususally doesnot =
say much, but most of the time, his answers ARE considered canon.
> completely =93family-friendly=94 way to introduce some of the vocabulary =
we
> lack. He was receptive to that, and also mentioned that now he has
> retired he isn=92t quite as concerned about the need to be =93family-frie=
ndly.=94
You mean words of bodily functions?
> I would say nIHwIj ghop =91the hand of my right side=92 and he said =93I =
would
> do that too,=94 making a dissatisfied face about the alternative nIH
> ghopwIj =91my hand of the right side.=92
Now, THAT is definitely a canon information to be added to our dictionaries.
maj!
-- =
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
Grammarian of the KLI
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/ST11
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
