[100561] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Klingon Word of the Day: wej

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven)
Tue Apr 7 15:30:43 2015

Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:30:26 +0200
From: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de>
To: "tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org"
 <tlhingan-hol@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <55242518.509@trimboli.name>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org

Am 07.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb SuStel:
> So who knows? Maybe {wej} "not yet" really is pronounced {weej}. Or
> maybe not. That's the trouble with having only fictional native
> speakers. However, the phenomenon is quite real, however it may
> manifest. We just can't examine it.

I agree completely. As for wej, it is of course always context related:

- 'ar Dalegh?
- wej vIlegh.

vs.
- Dalegh'a'?
- ghobe', wej vIlegh.

And even without context, the scene in Star Trek 3 for instance makes 
clear that {wej... wej...} can not mean "three... three..".
(Okay, that's context related again)

I think it's no problem at all to add some intonation and stress to make 
clear that you're not counting. I may make a difference like this

{[wej SuvwI'pu'] vIlegh}.
"I see ... [three warriors]"

vs.

{wej... SuvwI'pu' vIlegh}
"I see the warriors... not yet."

It cannot be expressed when written though.

-- 
Lieven L. Litaer
aka Quvar valer 'utlh
http://www.facebook.com/Klingonteacher
http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Stress

_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post