[100434] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] A long word
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Anderson)
Wed Mar 18 12:28:47 2015
In-Reply-To: <22847569.46721.1426694949208.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost>
From: Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:28:09 -0400
To: Klingon language email discussion forum <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@kli.org
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Anthony Appleyard
<a.appleyard@btinternet.com> wrote:
> I was looking through the old stuff on my computer and I found this attempt at making a maximum-length Klingon word:-
>
> SuchchuqnISqa'moHlaHlaw'taHneSghachHommeyqoqrajmo'
>
> V:visit VS1:each_other VS2:need VS3:[do_again|resume] VS4:cause VS5:be_able
> VS6:apparently VS7:continuous VS8:honorific VS9:-ation* NS1:diminutive
> NS2:pl_gen NS3:so_called NS4:your_pl_nonsentient NS5:due_to
I have a semi-tangential nitpick. What are you using that analyzes
{-raj} as "your_pl_nonsentient"? The {-ra'} vs. {-raj} distinction is
based on ability to use language, not ability to experience
sensations.
-- ghunchu'wI'
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
Tlhingan-hol@kli.org
http://mail.kli.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol
