[99976] in RedHat Linux List
Re: Redhat 6: real or rumor?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chuck Mead)
Tue Nov 17 21:40:12 1998
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 21:40:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Chuck Mead <chuck@moongroup.com>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9811172319190.2927-100000@browncat.demon.co.uk>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
On Tue, 17 Nov 1998, Jonathan Irving wrote:
> I think the problems with 2.0.36 can only be attributed to
> the kernel developers insofar as they let redhat bundle an
> unfinished release with 5.2. The "pristine" sources (and I
> use the term purely because RH claim to release only
> pristine sources) I used once the 2.0.36 kernel was
> actually released built fine, had significantly different
> configuration options (much closer to the previous release
> than the RH version) and built without any problems,
> whereas my attempt at building the RH 2.0.36 kernel failed
> with config errors.
Are you saying that the kernel which came with 5.2 was a bit buggy
and that the nwly released final of 36 works better?
Cheers!
--
Chuck Mead, CEO - Moongroup Consulting, Inc. <chuck@moongroup.com>
http://www.moongroup.com/
http://www.moongroup.com/unix/
There's no such thing as a free lunch.
-- Milton Friendman
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
