[98759] in RedHat Linux List
Re: Is Samba typically slower sending files than receiving?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jan Carlson)
Tue Nov 10 16:23:51 1998
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 13:27:38 -0500
From: Jan Carlson <janc@iname.com>
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
"Benny D. Helms" wrote:
> I've seen this with HTML in Outlook, but you're saying it also hoses up the
> works when you set it to RTF? In what way? I'm not doubting you, just
> feeling miserable for doing this all the time so that the few users on my
> immediate LAN can get pretty colors and bold fonts from me once every blue
> moon. What effect does RTF have on a non-Outlook viewer?
Is Outlook able to send RTF vs. plain text on a user by user basis?
If so, please check "prefers plain text" for redhat-list@redhat.com.
RTF is unreadable by many mailers. It's a huge bandwidth waster to
all.
I would hope that people read this list for its content, not for any
neon
effects.
The Netscape Messenger address book has a "prefers to receive HTML mail"
checkbox for each user. I appreciate that feature. It lets me
continue with
Netscape Messenger and this list too.
--
Jan Carlson
janc@iname.com Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
Mailed with Netscape 4.5 on Red Hat Linux 5.2
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request@redhat.com with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
