[918] in RedHat Linux List

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: A different approaches to RedHat updates

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Reilly)
Fri Oct 25 12:31:52 1996

Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 10:57:44 -0500
To: redhat-list@redhat.com
From: John Reilly <reillyj@onramp.net>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com


Now, I'm really confused!  I thought the $400 Red Hat support program did
exactly this.  What do these people get on their quarterly CD?

Does this also mean you don't do "integration" testing on the "fixes" you
release.

John


>> I wonder: Could part of the problem be from this policy of releasing
>> monolithic updates in the first place?  After all, the whole point of
>> RPM is to provide for gradual updates of a system.  How feasible would
>> it be for new rpms of packages to be released on a continual basis and
>> new CD "snapshots" of the current packages released, say, quarterly?
>
>Impossible. This would make integration testing nearly impossible and
>drive all of to early graves (I have one foot in my grave already, just
>a little push will finish me off <sigh>).
>
>Erik


--
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, HOWTO and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
  ________________________________________________________________________
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ   http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-HOWTO 
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips  http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post