[6282] in RedHat Linux List
Re: Disaster disks?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andreas Kostyrka)
Tue Nov 26 15:58:03 1996
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 21:22:36 +0100 (MET)
From: Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@ag.or.at>
To: "Dr.W.Tych" <w.tych@lancaster.ac.uk>
cc: redhat-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <199611262016.VAA16032@lifesaver.mtg.co.at>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
On Tue, 26 Nov 1996, Dr.W.Tych wrote:
> True. I had to add the drivers manually. Still, it is better than
> no disk, even if you have to modify the contents. It is far more
> difficult to modify the contents of a compressed ramdisk (boot/root)
> for Linux. For me at least.
What's wrong with the standard boot disk? Just start the install, and let
it load the driver for you :) You can always have an additional disc,
right?
Andreas
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
________________________________________________________________________
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
