| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Otto Hammersmith <ohammers@cu-online.com> To: redhat-list@redhat.com Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 12:17:23 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961126175042.29473A-100000@ferret.lmh.ox.ac.uk> from "Chris Evans" at Nov 26, 96 05:53:00 pm Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com Chris Evans wrote: > > > Hi, a minor point this time (in my "RedHat security drive"), but > /usr/local/bin appears before /bin,/usr/bin, etc. in my path. Sounds fine to me. > Whereas I certainly don't, some sites allow people to install their own > binaries/other stuff under /usr/local. This might open up trojan > possibilities. True, I suppose... but since Red Hat isn't configured that way by default, I see havning /usr/local/bin first in the path reasonable. There are plenty of times I would want something from /usr/local/bin, rather than /usr/bin, and I really don't want to have to mess with my path every time... it can get -really- messy -really- fast when you have to futz with paths. > PS If any people at redhat are interested, I can compile a list of > redhat-4.0 security points I have noted since installing it. All the ones > I have put to the list have tended to meet with favour. Sounds intereneting... thought, I'm not "pepole at redhat". You have made some good points, even though I may not agree with all of them. -- -Otto -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! ________________________________________________________________________ http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |