[5647] in RedHat Linux List
Re: teTeX vs. LaTeX 2e
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Wangsmo)
Fri Nov 22 18:28:56 1996
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:22:09 -0700 (MST)
From: Mike Wangsmo <wanger@fubar.cs.montana.edu>
To: Mike Wilkerson <milux@gxl.woodtech.com>
Cc: redhat-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <199611222037.OAA23373@gxl.woodtech.com>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com
On Fri, 22 Nov 1996, Mike Wilkerson wrote:
> Hello, fellow Red Hat uiars!
> with it. Does the LaTeX package comply to LaTeX 2e, or 2.09? If it's not 2e,
> does anyone have any good advice on where I should get a current LaTeX package?
>
It is LaTeX2e.
Mike
_______________________________________________________________________
Mike Wangsmo, Graduate Student wanger@fubar.cs.montana.edu
Montana State University http://www.cs.montana.edu/~wanger
602 Peter Koch (406) 586-0690
Bozeman, MT 59715
"May the Force be with you, always"
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
________________________________________________________________________
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null