[5287] in RedHat Linux List

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: 3com Bommerang netcard

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Zedalis)
Wed Nov 20 11:54:50 1996

Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 11:51:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Stephen Zedalis <tintype@zedalis.com>
To: Erik Troan <ewt@redhat.com>
cc: redhat-list@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.961120105541.7754N-100000@redhat.com>
Resent-From: redhat-list@redhat.com
Reply-To: redhat-list@redhat.com



On Wed, 20 Nov 1996, Erik Troan wrote:

> We've used the boomerang specific driver which good results.

Thats what we thought too, until we looked at the switch stats for
our etherswitch and saw just as many FCS and alignment errors at
100 Mbps as we saw collisions at 10 Mbps.  A properly run card should
show virtually no errors at 100 Mbps full duplex.  Funny thing, the
linux kernel reported the FCS and alignment errors as collisions, which
shouldn't happen in full duplex.  It may have been trying to autoswitch
between half and full.  (The switch can't autoswitch, it has dip switches
for half/full)



--
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
  ________________________________________________________________________
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ   http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Errata
  http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-Tips  http://www.redhat.com/mailing-lists
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe redhat-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post